After the Raise, the Adults Arrive

The day the round closes, two things happen. One is celebrated: the money lands. The other is never mentioned at the signing, and it is the one that determines how the next eighteen months go. Your job changes.

Before the raise, you answered to the business, and the business answered to its customers. That loop was the whole system, and you ran it from instinct, which is exactly what got you funded. After the raise, a third party sits inside the loop. The business now answers to a board, and the board runs on artefacts: the monthly investor update that will genuinely be read, the board pack that arrives on time and says something a professional investor finds useful, the burn tracked against the plan you yourself presented, the governance that the term sheet promised in clauses you skimmed at the time.

I want to describe what is actually happening here, because founders often experience this shift as bureaucracy, and it is not. It is the price and the machinery of other people's money, and it exists because the people whose money it is have seen what happens without it. I have sat on both sides of this table for three decades, advising raises of over $1bn through Goldman Sachs, Citi and Credit Suisse, and then producing the packs and living the burn discipline from the executive chairs, including at a listed company. From either seat the pattern is the same: the companies that treat the machinery as the job do well by their investors, and are backed again. The companies that treat it as an interruption to the real work find the next round mysteriously harder.

And here is the part experienced investors know and rarely say directly, because it sounds impolite at the celebration dinner. They backed you, personally, and they also expect experienced operators around you within a couple of quarters. Not to replace you; if they wanted a different chief executive they would not have wired the money. They expect it because they know the machinery has to be built by someone who has built it before, and they know the founder building it alone, by trial and error, on investor time, is the most expensive construction method available.

The obvious objection is cost, and the objection is correct about the full time version. Senior operators hired whole would consume more of the round than any sensible plan allows. Which is why what the smart money actually expects to see is the fractional version: a fractional CFO who owns the numbers, the forecast and the board pack, so that what the board reads is right first time; a fractional COO who converts the funded plan into something the team can actually execute at the new pace; an advisor at the board table who has sat on the investor side and can tell you what the questions mean, because board questions are rarely about what they are about.

Bought fractionally, the entire senior layer costs a fraction of one full time hire, arrives already knowing the job, and flexes as the company grows into needing more of it. This is not a compromise the funded company settles for. Increasingly, it is what a well built early board considers evidence of judgement.

The raise bought you time; that is all a raise ever buys. The operators around you decide what the time buys. If you have closed a round in the last two quarters and are building the machine around it, that is exactly the work I do, and the conversation costs nothing: paraag@aionadvisory.co.uk.

Continue reading: The First Hundred Days of Profit →

Or start the conversation: paraag@aionadvisory.co.uk →