Directed by Momentum

Here is a question that stops most capable people mid-sentence: when did you last choose your direction? Not adjust the plan, not set the quarter's targets. Choose the direction, deliberately, the way you would choose anything that expensive.

For most people the honest answer is years ago, and for some it is never, because direction was not so much chosen as inherited from motion. The career continued because it was there and continuing was what one did. The business grew because growth is what businesses do, and each stage proposed the next stage as if the sequence were a law of nature. The diary filled with whoever asked first. Every individual step was reasonable, most were well executed, and the sum of them is a heading that was never actually set. This is momentum doing what momentum does. It is an excellent engine and a useless navigator, and the trouble is that it never announces the difference. It simply keeps proposing more of the current direction, with a confidence that feels like purpose, and it never once asks where you would like to arrive.

The cost hides well, because drift does not feel like drift from the inside. It feels like busy. Speed is high, competence is visible, the metrics move, and none of that says anything about heading. A business can compound impressively for five years in a direction its owner would never have chosen from a standing start, and the better the execution, the further from shore the drift carries you, because good execution silences the questions that bad execution forces. I have watched this from boardrooms for three decades, and the pattern holds at every level: strategy gets reviewed relentlessly, quarterly, with documents and argument, while the direction of the life running the strategy has never had a review in its existence. The machine is inspected constantly. Nobody chose the heading.

So run the review, and let me make it concrete, because the reason nobody runs it is that it sounds vast and is actually an evening. Three questions, answered in writing, honestly.

First: if nothing changes, where is this currently heading? Project the present forward five years, mechanically, no optimism and no dread. The same trajectory of the work, the same shape of the weeks, the same trade-offs compounding. Write the destination down as if describing someone else's life, because in a sense you are: it is the life momentum has planned for you.

Second: did I choose that? Not, could I defend it. Chosen and defensible are different things, and this whole series has been about the gap between them. Some people read their projection and find, happily, that they would choose it again today, and the review becomes a confirmation, which is a genuinely valuable result. Most find at least one line they never agreed to.

Third: what would I choose now? Now, with current information, as the person the last chapters made, not the one who set off. This is Monday's money question, Tuesday's calendar, yesterday's borrowed summits, all pointing at one page. Write the heading you would set from here.

Then, and this is where the fear of the exercise dissolves, compare the two headings and notice that the correction is almost never the demolition people dread. Drift is gradual, so the accumulated error is usually an angle, not a reversal: a repositioning of the offer, a client filter, a different next level than the assumed one, a chapter change rather than an identity change. One evening of navigation against years of engine. The engine, to be clear, is a gift; do not switch it off. Just stop letting it steer. Momentum will happily power any heading you set. It only ever asks to keep going, and where it goes was always yours to decide.

Continue reading: A Life That Fits →

Or start the diagnosis: Take the free 10-minute Entrepreneur Gap scan →