It Only Looks Like Hard Work

The reason this problem goes unaddressed for so long is that it wears a disguise everybody admires.

A founder doing the work of five people does not present as a business with a structural fault. It presents as graft, drive and commitment, which are the very qualities everyone has been taught to respect. The team sees someone who will not ask of them anything they would not do themselves. Investors and peers see hunger. The founder, if they are honest, takes a quiet pride in being the one who can carry it all. Nobody in that picture has any incentive to call it a problem, because from every angle it looks like the thing that built the company rather than the thing that might now be limiting it.

I know this disguise from the inside, and not gently. For years I ran at a pace that everyone around me described as ambition and discipline, and I wore those descriptions as proof I was doing it right. Underneath them sat a belief I had never said out loud, that if I slowed down everything would fall apart, and the praise made that belief almost impossible to examine. The signals that something was wrong had been there for a long time. They were easy to override precisely because the behaviour producing them was being applauded.

It took my body presenting a bill I could not argue with to make me look. On the day I turned forty I ended up in hospital, and the thing that had been building quietly for years finally became impossible to ignore. The lesson I draw from it now is not really about health. It is about how long a person can run on a pattern that is hurting them when the pattern happens to look, from the outside, exactly like virtue.

A business can do precisely the same thing. It can run for years on the founder's total availability and look entirely healthy the whole time, because the output is there and the effort is obvious. The dependence builds underneath, invisibly, in the same way and for the same reason. Everything on the surface says this is working. The bill, when it comes, arrives as a wall the founder hits that no amount of additional effort can get them over, by which point the company has organised itself so completely around one person that unwinding it is a serious piece of work.

The useful moment to look, then, is the moment it still looks like hard work, rather than later, when it has started to look like something more costly. The signal to watch for is not failure or crisis. It is the quieter observation that you are at once the most capable person in your company and the most stretched, that the business runs beautifully as long as you do not stop, and that you cannot quite remember the last time you thought about its direction without being interrupted.

None of that means the effort was wrong. The effort built everything you have. It means the strategy that got you here and the way you have been running yourself have both reached their useful limit, and that both now need redesigning, together, before the wall rather than after it. A business cannot outgrow the person running it, which is why the two can only be worked on as one.

If that description is uncomfortably familiar, it is worth examining while you still have the room to choose. The free call is a simple place to begin, and for some entrepreneurs the One-Day or Three-Day workshop is where the whole picture, business and operator both, gets mapped honestly. Thirty minutes, free, on Tuesdays and Wednesdays.

Continue reading: Faster to Do It Myself →

Or if you'd rather start a conversation: Book the free 30-min Diagnostic →