The Second Raise

A different game, and nobody sends the memo.

Your first raise worked because early money buys belief. Angels backed you: a vision, a deck, a few calls, a coffee that went well. The cheques were sized for conviction, the diligence was a conversation, and the person deciding was deciding about you.

The second round is a different game, and nobody sends the memo. Founders walk into it carrying the playbook that worked last time, and the playbook is not merely stale, it is pointed at the wrong audience. Institutions back numbers, not stories. The deck matters less than the data room. Diligence stops being a conversation and becomes weeks of forensic questions from people you never meet. The cheques are bigger, so the committees are slower, and a committee cannot fall in love; it can only be persuaded by documents. The judge is no longer belief in you. It is evidence of repeatability.


I have sat on every side of this table across three decades and over $1bn of raises: advising through Goldman Sachs, Citi and Credit Suisse, investing in public equities at Goldman Sachs Asset Management, and backing startups and scaleups with my own money since. The pattern that kills second raises is always the same, and it is rarely the business. It is the founder discovering the new rules inside the process, one forensic question at a time, with their credibility attached to every hole the committee finds. A hole found in month three of a live raise is not a gap in a spreadsheet. It is a mark against the management team, and committees have long memories and short shortlists.

Which points to the one step that saves months, and it costs a conversation. Before you open the round, ask an investor from your last round to run mock diligence on your data room. Ask them to be unkind, the way a committee's analyst will be unkind, quietly, in writing, without you in the room to explain. Every hole they find is a hole a committee would have found later, except now it is found early, by a friend, with no credibility attached, and with time to fix it. Founders resist this because it feels like inviting criticism of an unfinished thing. That is exactly the point. The choice is not between criticism and no criticism. It is between criticism now, privately and cheaply, or later, expensively, with the round on the line.

The deeper preparation is making sure the business itself holds together under forensic eyes, and that is knowable in advance too. Investors at this stage expect a fundable business to have its core roles genuinely covered, not covered in name. The Entrepreneur Gap scan maps the eight roles in about ten minutes and shows which chairs an outside eye would find empty. Free, built for businesses already past £15k a month, and rather better run before the data room opens than after.


Continue reading: Proof You Can Check →

Or check your business first: Take the free 10-minute Entrepreneur Gap scan →

ASK THE ESSAYS

A question about this essay, or your own situation. Answered only from Paraag's writing.

Or sit with the full library in the Reading Room