The Version You Were Trying to Avoid

Part One

The thing that drives many founders out of corporate life is not usually the work itself. It is a specific version of themselves they found they were becoming, and did not want to keep being.

The corporate version was busy in a particular way. It was optimised. It was tired in a way that did not quite resolve on holiday. It measured the week in meetings, the month in targets, and the year in performance reviews. It was competent, often impressively so, and it had started to suspect that the competence was not actually being spent on what mattered most. It was also, most quietly, starting to forget what mattered most, which was part of why leaving felt urgent.

The founder left to get out of that version. The business was meant to be the vehicle for a different life, with different rhythms, different priorities, and a different sense of self inside it. The business was the path to something wider than the business itself.

What happens to many founders, without them noticing, is that the business slowly reconstructs the same structure they were trying to escape. The targets come back, in a different form. The performance pressure comes back, in a different form. The tiredness comes back, though with more ownership and usually more variety. The quiet sense of being slightly off-centre in their own life comes back. The same version of themselves they left corporate to avoid is, six years later, sitting in the founder chair, doing the same thing with a different job title.

This is not because the founder has failed. It is because the underlying dynamic, the structural thing that made corporate life feel narrowing, was not about corporate life specifically. It was about the relationship between the person and the work. The relationship has reappeared inside the business, because the person did not change. Only the location did.

Part Two

The work that addresses this is not another restructure of the business. The business can be restructured many times and will keep producing the same weather if the person running it has not changed. What addresses it is a change in the person.

Specifically, it is a change in the founder's relationship with what she is producing, how much of herself she is putting into it, what she expects the business to give back, and what she expects of herself. The business cannot fix an over-identified founder by becoming more efficient. An over-identified founder running an efficient business is still an over-identified founder, just with better margins.

The founders I work with who make this shift often describe the change in ways that are hard to put on a spreadsheet. They still run the business. The business still grows. The hours are often still long in the early stages of the shift. What has changed is how much of them is in the work, and how much of them has been returned to the rest of their life. They are less the engine. They are more the architect. The business runs in a way that resembles what they imagined when they first started it, rather than in a way that resembles what they left corporate to avoid.

Continue reading: Workaholic →

Or if you'd rather start a conversation: Book the free 30-min Diagnostic →